Integrating Grammarly Tools to Enhance Writing Efficiency in Senior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jadila.v3i1.389Keywords:
Grammarly, senior high school, writing efficacyAbstract
The background of this research is that the writer wants to examine the use of grammar in improving writing efficacy. The purpose of this study was to find out the application of Grammarly to improve the efficiency of writing skills in senior high schools. Researchers used descriptive qualitative methods by using interviews, observations, and questionnaires. In this study, 30 participants were observed, and at the end of the interview, eight students with high questionnaire results were taken to be interpreted. Participants are high school students studying in the 2022/2023 school year. The results and discussion show that Grammarly helps high school students learn writing. Students are interested and confident in using Grammarly with the various advantages available during the learning process. This tool is also practical to use and easy to access, so it doesn't make it difficult for students. Students showed positive views of using Grammarly and felt that it was more helpful in exploring writing skills using Grammarly with their various advantages.
Downloads
References
Ambarwati, E. K. (2021). Indonesian university students' appropriating Grammarly for formative feedback. 4(June). https://doi.org/10.35706/eltinfc.v4i1.5216
Ariyanti. (2016). The teaching of EFL writing in Indonesia. Dinamika Ilmu, 16(2), 264.
Ashrafganjoe, M., Rezai, M. J., & Elhambakhsh, S. E. (2022). Providing computer-based feedback through Grammarly ® in writing classes. 12(2), 163–176.
Daniel , P., & Leslie, D. (2013). Grammar software ready for EFL writers?. OnCUE Journal, 9(4), 393.
Daroina, A., Febriani, W. E., Aulianisa, A., & Fadlia, W. A. (2022). Systematic literature review : grammarly as a medium in analyzing grammar for university students. Celti, 276–289.
Fahmi, M. A., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). EFL students' perception of the use of Grammarly and teacher feedback. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.849
Fitria, T. N. (2021). "Grammarly" as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students' alternative for English writing. Metathesis, 5(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519
Fitria, T. N. (2022). Identifying grammatical and mechanical errors of students' writing : using "grammarly" as an online assessment. Lingua Didaktika, 16(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v16i2.116824
Fitriana, K., & Nurazni, L. (2022). EFL students' perception on the use of Grammarly and teacher feedback. Journal of English Teaching. 8(1), 15–25.
Ghufron, M. A., & Rosyida, F. (2018). The role of Grammarly in assessing English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. Applied Research on English Education (AREE), 2(2), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4582
Gilakjani, P. (2017). A review of the literature on the integration of technology into the learning and teaching of English language skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5), 95-110.
Javier, D. R. (2022). App review using tech tools for academic writing : Grammarly as a pedagogical tool. MEXTESOL, 46(2), 1–3. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1357805.pdf
Koltovskaia, S. (2022). Postsecondary L2 writing teachers' use and perceptions of Grammarly as a complement to their feedback. ReCALL, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344022000179
Mubarok, A., Syafi, A., Pendidikan, P., Inggris, B., Al, S., Surabaya, H., Pendidikan, P., Inggris, B., Al, S., & Surabaya, H. (2020). Grammarly : An Online EFL Writing Companion. ELTICS, 5(2), 13-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.31316/eltics.v5i2.912
Parra G, L., & Calero S, X. (2019). Automated writing evaluation tools in the improvement of writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 210- 211.
Purwanto, M. N. (1996). Psikologi pendidikan. Bandung: P.T.Remaja Rosdakarya.
Riana, A., Tambunan, S., Andayani, W., & Sari, W. S. (2022). Investigating EFL students' linguistic problems using Grammarly as automated writing evaluation feedback. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46428
Tiryaki, E. N. (2016). Identification types and discourse markers in Turkish language teacher candidates' argumentative texts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.2033
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Like Raskova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
_1.png)
