Adjacent Consonants and the Universality of Sonority Sequencing Principle in Dotyali Dialects: Syllable Contact Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jadila.v1i3.118Keywords:
Dotyali Dialects, Sonority Sequencing Principle, Syllable ContactAbstract
This paper presents on all the possible adjacent consonant letters in Dotyali, one of the descendant language of Sanskrit, mainly spoken in Shudoor Paschim Nepal [sʊdʊrə-pəssɪmə] (Far-western) and compares the results of their phonological changes in seven local contemporary speech (dialects):Doteli,Dadeldhuri,Bajhangi,Achhami,Baitadeli,Darchuli and Bajureli. Based on the corpus data from the field survey conducted in between July-September 2017 on a list of 1000 frequently used Dotyali words, this paper comes with a conclusion that even the onset clusters with rising sonority profile (except glides) are broken up by vowel epenthesis or simplify the clusters by deletion. It is revealed that dialects, except from the Achhami and Bajureli, the consonants with different degree of sonority across the syllable boundary tend to be changed due to syllable contact to meet Sonority hierchy, but the sonority distance between two consonants (coda and onset consonants) varies, therefore phonological changes like assimilation, dissimilation, desonorization, contact anaptyxis, contact methasis etc. goes differently. The phonological changes in Bajureli occurs maily due to other separate independent constraints.
Downloads
References
Adhikari S. (2014). History of Nepali Language. Kathmandu:Bhudipuran Prakashan.
Bhatta, D., & Zhou J.X. (2019). Evolution and Features of Dotyali Consonants—A New Evidence for Historical Comparative Linguistics. Papers on Language and History. China: The Linguistic Institute. Sichuan Normal University (12):1-22.
Bhatta, D. (2020). Historical and Phonological Studies on Dotyali and its Dialects of Nepal. Doctoral dissertation. Sichuan Normal University.
Clements G.N. (1990). The role of sonority cycle in core of syllabification:Papers in Laboratory Phonology (J.Kingston and M.Becakam eds).Cambribridge and New York: Cambribridge University Press (1):283-333.
Maria G. (2001). Falling sonority onsets, loanwords, and Syllable Contact. The Main Session. Papers from the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Andronis, Mary, Christopher Ball, Heidi Elston and Sylvain Neuvel eds.) CLS 37. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society (1).
Maria G.. 2001. Exceptions to sonority distance generalizations. The Main Session. Papers from the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society ( Andronis, Mary, Christopher Ball, Heidi Elston and Sylvain Neuvel eds.) CLS38. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society (1).
Davis S. (1998). Syllable Contact in Optimality Theory. Journal of Korean Linguistics (23):181-211.
Murray, Robert, and Vennemann, Theo. (1983). Sound change and syllable structure in Germanic phonology.' Language (59) : 514 -528.
Chautaut RD.2013.The History and Spoken Language of That Time.Kathmandu:Lusha Press.
A Sociolinguistic Survey of Far-Western Development Region. (2012). Linguistic Survey of Nepal(LinSuN, Central Department of Lngistics: Tribhuwan University.
Clements G.N. (1990).The role of sonority cycle in core of syllabification: Papers in Laboratory Phonology (J.Kingston and M.Becakam eds).Cambribridge and New York: Cambridge University Press (1) :283-333
Sam, Z. (2017). Indo-European Reduplication: Synchrony, Diachrony and Theory:264.
Kobayashi, M. (1970). Historical Phonology of Old Indo-Aryan Consonants.Japan:Study of La nguages and Cultures of Asia and Africa Monograph,Series(42)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dharm Dev Bhatta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








_1.png)



