Language Politeness Among Adolescents: Sociolinguistic Study

Koni Hasa Enda Citra; Kasmantoni Kasmantoni; Heny Friantary

doi:10.52690/jadila.v2i2.211

Authors

Koni Hasa Enda Citra Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu
Kasmantoni Kasmantoni Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu
Heny Friantary Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jadila.v2i2.211

Keywords:

Language politeness, adolescent, sociolinguistic, maxim

Abstract

The problem raised in this study is how to comply with the principles of politeness in language and is there a violation of the principles of politeness in language among teenagers in Telaga Dewa V RT 15 Bengkulu City in terms of communicating and interacting. The purpose of this study is to describe the adherence to the principles of language politeness and violations of the principles of language politeness among adolescents in Telaga Dewa V RT 15 Bengkulu City in terms of communicating and interacting. This type of research is descriptive qualitative research. The subject of this study is the act of politeness in language performed by teenagers in Telaga Dewa V, RT 15, Bengkulu City in the form of conversation or interaction. While the informants in this study were several teenagers who lived in Telaga Dewa V, RT 15, Bengkulu City. Data collection techniques in the form of observation, documentation and interviews. The results of this study conclude that there are four maxims that are obeyed by adolescents in Telaga Dewa V, RT 15, Bengkulu City, namely tact maxim, generosity maxim, approbation maxim and modesty maxim which consists of 23 utterances. There were four violations of the principle of politeness in language at Telaga Dewa V, RT 15, Bengkulu City, namely the maxim of wisdom, the maxim of generosity, the maxim of appreciation/praise and the maxim of simplicity/humility which consists of 11 utterances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Budiwati, T. R. (2017). Kesantunan Berbahasa Mahasiswa dalam Berinteraksi dengan Dosen di Universitas Ahmad Dahlan: Analisis Pragmatik. The Urecol Proceding, (1): 559.

Chaer, A. (2010). Sosiolinguistik Pengenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, A dan Leonie, A. (2004). Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Jannah, M. (2016). Remaja dan Tugas-Tugas Perkembangannya dalam Islam. Jurnal Psikoislamedia, 1 (1): 243.

Rahardi, K. (200). Pragmatik Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Fauziah, M. (2017). Kesantunan Sebagai Kajian Sosiolinguistik. Al-munzir, 5 (1): 454.

Malabar, S. (2015). Sosiolinguistik. Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing.

Mislikhah, S. (2014). “Kesantunan Berbahasa,” Ar-Raniry: International Journal of Islamic Studies 1, 1 (2): 287.

Moleong, L.J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nababan, P.W.J. (1984). Sosiolinguistik Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ngalim, A. (2013). Sosiolinguistik Suatu Kajian Fungsional dan Analisisnya. Surakarta: PBSID FKIP UMS.

Prawira, Y.A. (2013). Keragaman Sosiolinguistik berupa Pilihan Bahasa Ragam Speech Menolak pada peserta Diklat Ditempat Kerja Kota Sukabumi Years. Jurnal Balai Diklat Keagamaan Bandung, (20): 327.

Rimbing, J dan Ruty, J.K. (2020). Tindak Tutur Anak Remaja di Kabupaten Minahasa dalam Percakapan Keluarga dan Nilai Kesantunan Berbahasa.” Jurnal Membaca 5, 5 (1): 43-44.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta CV.

Subyantoro. (2014). Teori Pembelajaran Bahasa. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang Press.