Rhetorical Structure of Method Sections of Postgraduate Thesis in English Education Study Program Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jadila.v3i3.424Keywords:
English education, Method section, Rhetotical structure, ThesisAbstract
The method section of a thesis is crucial because it conveys the information upon which the study's validity is ultimately evaluated. The method section describes the procedure, instruments, design, data acquisition, and data analysis, among other components. Students may encounter several obstacles when composing a thesis, including the rhetorical issue. This study examines the rhetorical structure of the methodology section of a graduate thesis. This investigation employed a fundamental content analysis with quantitative methodology. The data was collected from 50 English education postgraduate theses at the University of Bengkulu. The results indicate that five Moves occurred in the thesis with varying frequencies. Moves 2, 3, and 4 occur most frequently, followed by Move 5, with Move 1 occurring least frequently. Furthermore, this research presents fifteen communicative purposes as Steps. 2 Steps are Obligatory (M2S1 and M3S2), 5 Steps are Conventional (M2S2, M2S3, M3S3, M4S1, M4S2), 7 Steps are Optional (M1S1, M3S1, M4S3, M5S2, M5S3, M5S4, M5S5), and 1 Step is non-obvious (M5S1). In conclusion, this study provides information about the rhetorical structure of the method sections of a thesis in order to heighten students' awareness of the significance of the three Obligatory movements in the method section. Students can use the framework or model presented in this study to present important information and construct a strong argument in the methodology section.
Downloads
References
Arsyad, S. (2013). A genre-based analysis of Indonesian research articles in the social sciences and humanities written by Indonesian speakers. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 8(3), 234–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2013.849711
Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., & Adnan, Z. (2020). The argument style in research article discussions to support research findings in language studies. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16626
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating Rigour and Credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational Research - Planning, Cnnducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research - Fifth Edition. In Pearson Education, Inc. (Vol. 62, Issue 1).
Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content Analysis. Pocket Guides to Social Work Research Methods. In Oxford University Press.
Fang, Z. (2021). Demystifying academic writing: Genres, moves, skills, and strategies. In Demystifying Academic Writing: Genres, Moves, Skills, and Strategies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131618
Hsiao, C.-H., & Yu, H.-Y. (2012). Knowledge Presentation in Thesis Writing-Examining Move Use in Reviewing Literature. English Teaching & Learning, 36(3), 133–179. https://doi.org/10.6330/ETL.2012.36.3.04
Kafes, H. (2016). Generic Structure of The Method Sections of Research Articles and MA Theses by Turkish Academic Writers. International Journal of Language Academy, 4(12), 132–132. https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.429
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis An Introduction to Its Methodology Fourth Edition Content Analysis.
Kutay, U. (2016). A genre analysis of the methodology sections of descriptive medical-surgical nursing articles. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 4(7), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.76407
Lim, J. M. H. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.001
Manchishi, P. C., Ndhlovu, D., & Mwanza, D. S. (2015). Common Mistakes Committed and Challenges Faced in Research Proposal Writing. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 2(3), 126–138. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijhsse/v2-i3/14.pdf
Miin, J., & Lim, H. (2011). Delineating sampling procedures: Pedagogical significance of analysing sampling descriptions and their justifications in TESL experimental research reports. Ibérica, 21, 71–92.
Morales, R. C. (2016). Discourse features of methodology sections of research articles in high-impact and non-high-impact applied linguistics journals. In Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS) (Vol. 4).
Mosquera, H. J., & Tulud, D. M. (2021). Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics Methodology Section of Graduate School Thesis Manuscripts: A Genre Analysis Probe of Rhetorical Structure. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(9), 16. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal
Musa, N. F., Khamis, N., & Zanariah, J. (2015). The structure of method section in engineering research articles. Asian Social Science, 11(17), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n17p74
Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00025-9
Pho, P. D. (2008). How can Learning about the Structure of Research Articles Help International Students? Conference Proceedings of the 19th ISANA International Education Conference, 1–11.
Pramoolsook, I., Li, Q., & Wang, S. (2015). The Methods Sections in Management and Marketing Research Articles: Rhetorical Variations Between Two Sub-Disciplines of Business. In IJASOS-International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences: Vol. I (Issue 2). http://ijasos.ocerintjournals.org
Pujiyanti, I., Arsyad, S., & A, Arsyad, A. (2018). Rhetorical Structure Analysis on Introduction Chapters of English Master Theses by Indonesian Postgraduate Students. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 5(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v5i2.8423
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Watson, B. R., & Fico, F. (2019). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. In Routledge (fourth edi). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429464287
Sovann, L. (2022). Rhetorical Structure of Method Section: A Comparative Study on Research Articles Written by Cambodian Authors Published in National and International Journals. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggri, 15(1), 168. https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/ENGEDU
Starfield, S., & Paltridge, B. (2019). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: Context, identity, genre. In Journal of Second Language Writing (Vol. 43). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.10.002
Sumayo, G., & Tulud, D. (2021). Genre-Based Inquiry of Literature Review in Social Sciences Master’s Theses. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 3(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v3i2.584
Swales, J. (2004). Research Genres: Exploration and Applications (first edit). Cambridge University Press.
Tulud, D., & Tulud, D. M. (2017). Probes on the rhetorical moves of research methods in research articles. Asian EFL Journal, 98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321887605
Wadison, E., & Robert, F. . (2022). Rhetorical Structure on Writing Result and Discussion Section of Undergraduate Student’s Thesis at Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. Literary Criticism, 06(02), 6.
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
Zhang, B., & Wannaruk, A. (2016). Rhetorical Structure of Education Research Article Methods Sections. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 51, 156–184.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Abdullah Azzam An-Nashir, Syafryadin Syafryadin Syafryadin, Azwandi Azwandi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








_1.png)



